The donnor of human rights lesson, flouted them Part 2
It is in our Kingdom, the Queen and the heir to the throne, who viced and seconded the Queen is more symbolic than a President; he is the second God Deputy on earth; he is not the supreme leader of United Kingdom only but the Head of States of the entire Commonwealth countries. He is a figure of the past, present and future through the rich history, the present and the future of the Kingdom he serves. The symbol and power the Queen (the monarch) and heir have are so great at an extent under British law they cannot be courted not to talk even imprison. It is exactly regarding the sacredness, the dignity the symbol that the two authorities represented to God and the Subjects that laws set that they cannot be courted, nor even being arrested in order to avoid the humiliation of such symbol, sacredness, and dignity; especially when for Kingdom as ours with great historic empire, our image and respect we give to our leaders and laws and values are the first defense of our world and Empire. That made being a British Subject is everything that every wants to be, knowing the values and the greatness in it. This discipline in our thought, in our behavior and respecting each other, made us clearly the most courageous and the most creative and pragmatic human community on earth and human history; Hitler knows lot of things about that, the world through the values we spread in it and are making its proud know more than everything about that. Our greatness is in our respect of sacredness, of hierarchy, of traditions, laws and charts. Nothing can prosper in a society where there is lack of order, values, and noble ideal; a society where there is no respect of the authority. Still humiliating the Queen and her heir to the throne is humiliating not only a British, but also a Nigerian or a Canadian, or an Indian as they are Head States of the Commonwealth.
This huge crime and humiliations above all words or human understanding is done since April 13, 1983 with the arrest of Prince Charles and his imprisonment on September 31, 1983. Worst there are currently 35 years that this high humiliation for United Kingdom is going one. It dirties everything that makes our Kingdom greatness and respect. Imagine how deep in their hearts our enemies and rivals as Argentines will say or feel, «Look they are barbaric, uncivilized...just look how they give their second leaders to humiliations of the highest form…" Their respect of us as their rivals is in function of the image we give to the world as Kingdom, and our respect of our leaders, laws, traditions, charts and symbols.
Furthermore, as we give the example of the American President, imagine that this President is given to foreign countries among which there are at least one that is considered as enemy of Great Britain to talk about Russia to imprison our second political, religious, and symbolic figure. It is important to note the time the Prince was arrested and give to the network of countries the relation was more than bad between Russia and UK. It was in 1983 in the middle of cold war. The tension was so high at an extent that Queen Elizabeth II wrote a secret war declaration speech on Russia. It is in this context that the Prince was given to a network of countries among which Russia is certainly the first either in the imprisonment in Niger. Because, George Bush who recruited and trained the mercenaries who would jailed the Prince, though then American Vice President uses largely his descent country Russia’s influence in all those processes. That shows no more no less that the council arrested the British Prince to the throne to give him to the enemy for being imprisoned: Knowing the bad relations then between the two countries that was more than worst; no one would imprison the Prince in horrible conditions than Russian. Imagine the Prince, the political prisoner aged only 3 has been victim of horrible torture as his right thigh was burn with a red burning iron and it was done with the clear and plan intent not only to humiliate the Prince and UK, but also to traumatize and break the principal proud of the Prince. Which kind of persons would torture such way a kid; burn a kid aged only 3 with a red burning iron without anesthetic? Persons who feels the greatest hate for the country of the kid, and especially the Subjects of the kid who was the heir to the throne, then the second representatives of his Kingdom.
Prince Charles on August 17, 2018.
The Russians could not more humiliate the British more than burning Prince Charles. And the two mercenaries who did it Oscar Wild who keeps the Prince and Iren Samson who burn him where under direct control of George Bush, from whom they took directly their orders, the same Bush who is largely under Russians influences it is a secret for no one. Then clearly then as now whenever, the Russians or one of the countries jailing him has a problem with Great Britain, they simply and logically torture and humiliate the British Prince heir to the throne to take revenge against UK. Prince Charles, the heir to the British throne was simply given to the enemy to be tortured. This shows how the council was the shame of the British blood. How can for our political ambition and differences give one of us, the second leaders of our Kingdom to the enemy? Where is this thing only possible with us that made that we never give up in front of the enemies and save ours and the world than capitulating to it? Hitler knows lot of things about that, he that we defeated to save the world. Was it with, Prince Charles we give the dignity, the pride of our Kingdom to have peace with the enemy, because still the tension was high then between UK and the Soviet Union? The question is far of being odd. In all cases the common sense made that if we want to set our differences we should solve it among ourselves, in other words instead of giving the second leader of our Kingdom for satisfying our illegal and illegitimate ambition, why didn’t we jail him ourselves with our Subjects, in case we come not to be stopped by the importance of respecting our leaders and ourselves through them? Why didn’t’even kill him to save the honour and the image of our blood and Kingdom? It would have been much better than giving our Kingdom second leader to be torture and humiliating to the enemy in front of the entire world during decades. And it is still continuing. Those words are written by the Prince by himself I would have wanted to die than living what I live, not because I hate life, no because for me, my image and honour as well those of our Kingdom linked to me is better than life. What is the worth of a life without honour and dignity, either? Nothing will I say.
Sometimes, the humiliation and torture that the Prince lives and his Kingdom through him were so great at an extent that sometimes he felt; he would have been lucky if he was a Guantanamo prisoner. Because though terrorists of the worst kind, some having killed thousands and hundred thousand people they were jailed according to national and international laws relevant to prisoners, and their rights were respected than those of Prince Charles, an innocent person arrested and jailed without doing any wrong. What is more hurtful than living such tragic life, being born and upbringing as a Prince with all honour, love and given living conditions proper to his title and later being imprisoned in such degrading, humiliating and torturing ways. Prince Charles lives that. For example Guantanamo prisoners are not intoxicated with the very harmful bismuth that gave horrible pain. They are not systematically sickened by flu and burning. They are not jailed starved, neither was they jail humiliated. Prince Charles has lived and is living all that.
That is how Prince Charles was also given by the council to the enemies for the purpose of destroying UK through blackmailing it.
